Identification of the main predictor of the success of treatment of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in newborns

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15574/SP.2026.1(153).169174

Keywords:

newborns, diaphragmatic hernia, pulmonary hypertension

Abstract

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) in newborns is one of the most severe congenital anomalies with a high mortality rate. The diaphragmatic defect leads to the herniation of abdominal organs (stomach, intestines, spleen, liver) into the thoracic cavity, causing lung compression and profound dysfunction of the respiratory, cardiovascular, and digestive systems.

Aim - to establish a hierarchy of prognostic factors determining treatment success and survival rates in newborns with CDH.

A retrospective medical record review was conducted on 18 hospitalized newborns with CDH (10 males, 8 females) aged 0 to 21 days. The clinical course, instrumental findings, and the effectiveness of multidisciplinary treatment strategies were evaluated. Of the 18 patients, 12 underwent surgical repair (one postoperative death). Six infants died preoperatively due to severe refractory pulmonary hypertension (PH) and comorbidities. Clinical cases illustrate contrasting courses. A 21-day-old female with late manifestation and absent PH was rapidly stabilized and operated on. Conversely, a 1-day-old male with prenatally diagnosed CDH presented in critical condition due to severe PH and hypoxemia. He required massive pharmacological support and prolonged (72-hour) preoperative stabilization prior to type B CDH repair, followed by extended mechanical ventilation and parenteral nutrition.

Conclusions. PH severity often correlating with diaphragmatic defect size is the leading criterion determining optimal surgical timing and success; gestational age is not a decisive prognostic factor. Since standard PH therapies may fail, preoperative preparation duration must be highly individualized based on therapeutic response. Success fundamentally relies on a coordinated multidisciplinary team.

This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from the children’s parents for the conduct of the study.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

Basurto D, Russo FM, Papastefanou I, Bredaki E, Allegaert K, Pertierra A et al. (2022). Pulmonary hypertension in congenital diaphragmatic hernia: antenatal prediction and impact on neonatal mortality. Prenat Diagn. 42(10): 1303-1311. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6207; PMid:35801282

Beurskens LW, Tibboel D, Lindemans J, Duvekot JJ, Cohen-Overbeek TE, Veenma DC et al. (2010). Retinol status of newborn infants is associated with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Pediatrics. 126(4): 712-720. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-0521; PMid:20837596

Brownlee EM, Howatson AG, Davis CF, Sabharwal AJ. (2009). The hidden mortality of congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a 20-year review. J Pediatr Surg. 44(2): 317-320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.10.076; PMid:19231525

Chandrasekharan PK, Rawat M, Madappa R, Rothstein DH, Lakshminrusimha S. (2017). Congenital Diaphragmatic hernia - a review. Maternal Health, Neonatology and Perinatology. 3: 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40748-017-0045-1; PMid:28331629 PMCid:PMC5356475

Chaudhari T, Schmidt Sotomayor N, Maheshwari R. (2024). Diagnosis, management and long term cardiovascular outcomes of phenotypic profiles in pulmonary hypertension associated with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Front Pediatr. 12: 1356157. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2024.1356157; PMid:38590769 PMCid:PMC10999638

Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Study Group; Kevin P Lally, et al. (2007). Defect Size Determines Survival in Infants With Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 42(9): 1526-1531. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-3040; PMid:17766505

Emanuel H, Breitschopf HV, Harting MT, Martinez Castillo DJ, Yadav A, McBeth K et al. (2023). Pulmonary outcomes of congenital diaphragmatic hernia patients based on defect size (CDH Study Group Stage). Transl Pediatr. 12(8): 1490-1503. https://doi.org/10.21037/tp-23-14; PMid:37692542 PMCid:PMC10485646

Gallot D, Boda C, Ughetto S, Perthus I, Robert-Gnansia E, Francannet C et al. (2007). Prenatal detection and outcome of congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a French registry-based study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 29(3): 276-283. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.3863; PMid:17177265

Greer JJ. (2013). Current concepts on the pathogenesis and etiology of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 189(2): 232-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2013.04.015; PMid:23665522

Mah VK, Zamakhshary M, Mah DY, Cameron B, Bass J, Bohn D et al. (2009). Absolute vs relative improvements in congenital diaphragmatic hernia survival: what happened to "hidden mortality". J Pediatr Surg. 44(5): 877-882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.01.046; PMid:19433161

McGivern MR, Best KE, Rankin J, Wellesley D, Greenlees R, Addor MC, Arriola L et al. (2015). Epidemiology of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in Europe: a register-based study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 100(2): F137-144. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2014-306174; PMid:25411443

Otaño JC, Murua V, Rugilo J, Reussmann A, Rührnschopf CG et al. (2024). Hernia diafragmática congénita: relación entre el tamaño del defecto y evolución. Experiencia en un centro de referencia. Anales de Pediatría. 101(1): 29-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anpedi.2024.04.014; PMid:38971707

Salas GL, Otaño JC, Cannizzaro CM, Mazzucchelli MT, Goldsmit GS. (2020). Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: postnatal predictors of mortality. Arch Argent Pediatr. 118(3): 173-179. https://doi.org/10.5546/aap.2020.eng.173

Veenma DC, de Klein A, Tibboel D. (2012). Developmental and genetic aspects of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Pediatr Pulmonol. 47(6): 534-545. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.22553; PMid:22467525

Wat MJ, Veenma D, Hogue J, Holder AM, Yu Z, Wat JJ et al. (2011). Genomic alterations that contribute to the development of isolated and non-isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Med Genet. 48(5): 299-307. https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg.2011.089680; PMid:21525063 PMCid:PMC3227222

Published

2026-02-27