The impact of various options of the prenatal informational preparation on the success of breastfeeding children
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15574/SP.2024.6(142).6070Keywords:
children of infancy, feeding, breastfeeding, preparation for childbirthAbstract
Breastfeeding definitely has many benefits for the baby, the mother, and the family in general.
Aim - to study the impact of various methods of prenatal preparation on breastfeeding.
Materials and methods. The survey was conducted of 578 families that gave birth to children in the last 10 years. Families were divided into 8 groups depending on how they prepared for the birth of a child.
Results. Most had children in their first two years. During pregnancy, they more often planned to breastfeed. A third planned to breastfeed until 1-2 years. The chance that they would plan to breastfeed for 6 months was 5.4 times higher in the first group compared to the third, 4.3 times higher in the second versus the third. Most children received supplementation before breastfeeding at least once, most often formula. 80% first gave supplementation in the maternity hospital compared to the total number of families that supplemented with formula. The chance of giving formula in the maternity hospital was 2.5 times higher than not giving at all in the first and second groups. 2/3 had problems with breastfeeding, the smallest chance in the fifth group. 70% sought help when problems first arose, most often in the fourth and fifth groups. Most of all, they turned to lactation consultants or doctors. Half believed that they could be helped. The chance of being able to help in the fourth group is 33 times greater than in the first, 17 times greater than in the second, and 68 times greater than in the eighth.
Conclusions. Most parents, regardless of the preparation level for the childbirth or without preparation at all, have plans to breastfeed their children, but the more information the family receives before the birth, the less likely: the child will receive supplemental formula; that there will be a problem with breastfeeding; the family is more likely to: seek help; that they will search help from a qualified specialist; that breastfeeding will last longer. The more the family is aware of issues related to BF during pregnancy, the more successful BF will be after the baby is born.
The research was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration. The study protocol was approved by the Local Ethics Committee of all participating institutions. The informed consent of the patient was obtained for conducting the studies.
No conflict of interests was declared by the authors.
References
Baza AS, Mignacca C, Delgado PE. (2023). A Technological Approach to Improved Breastfeeding Rates and Self-Efficacy: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study. J Hum Lact. 39(4): 679-687. https://doi.org/10.1177/08903344231190625; PMid:37571838
Borona G, Gualdana G, Maga G. (2023). Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy: A Systematic Review of Psychometric Properties Using COSMIN. J Hum Lact. 39(4): 595-614. https://doi.org/10.1177/08903344231190624; PMid:37592834
Brockway M, Benzies K, Hayden KA. (2017). Interventions to Improve Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy and Resultant Breastfeeding Rates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Hum Lact. 3(3): 486-499. Epub 2017 Jun 23. URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0890334417707957. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334417707957; PMid:28644764
Dennis CL, McQueen K, Dol J. (2024). Psychometrics of the breastfeeding self-efficacy scale and short form: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 4(1): 637. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17805-6. PMID: 38419045; PMCID: PMC10903029. URL: https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-024-17805-6/.
Fan Y, Li J, Wong JY, Tak Fong DY. (2024). Text messaging interventions for breastfeeding outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 150: 104647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104647; PMid:38056353
Gonzales Jr AM. (2020). Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy of Early Postpartum Mothers in an Urban Municipality in the Philippines. Asian Pac Isl Nurs J. 4(4): 135-143. https://doi.org/10.31372//20190404.1023; PMid:32055681 PMCid:PMC7014381
Nourizadeh R, Shamsdanesh S, Mehrabi E. (2023). The Effect of Psychological Interventions on the Anxiety and Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Iran J Public Health. 52(5): 937-949. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v52i5.12710
Odom EC, Li R, Scanlon KS, Perrine CG. (2013). Reasons for Earlier Than Desired Cessation of Breastfeeding. Pediatrics. 131(3): e726-e732. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2012-1295; PMid:23420922 PMCid:PMC4861949
Ojantausta O, Pöyhönen N, Ikonen R. (2023). Health professionals' competencies regarding breastfeeding beyond 12 months: a systematic review. International Breastfeeding Journal. 18(1): 55. URL: https://internationalbreastfeedingjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13006-023-00591-z. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-023-00591-z; PMid:37904223 PMCid:PMC10617142
Otsuka K, Taguri M, Dennis CL (2014). Effectiveness of a Breastfeeding Self-efficacy Intervention: Do Hospital Practices Make a Difference? Matern Child Health J. 18(1): 296-306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-013-1265-2; PMid:23592322 PMCid:PMC3880483
Perez‐Escamilla R, Martinez JL, Segura‐Perez S. (2016). Impact of the Baby‐friendly Hospital Initiative on breastfeeding and child health outcomes: a systematic review. Matern Child Nutr. 12(3): 402-417. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12294; PMid:26924775 PMCid:PMC6860129
Perez-Escamilla R, Tomori C, Hernandez-Cordero S. (2023). Breastfeeding: crucially important, but increasingly challenged in a market-driven world. The Lancet. 401(10375): 472-485. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01932-8; PMid:36764313
Segura‐Perez S, Richter L, Rhodes EC. (2022). Risk factors for self‐reported insufficient milk during the first 6 months of life: A systematic review. Matern Child Nutr. 18(3): e13353. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13353; PMid:35343065 PMCid:PMC9113468
Tuthill EL, McGrath JM, Graber M. (2016). Breastfeeding Self-efficacy: A Critical Review of Available Instruments. J Hum Lact. 32(1): 35-45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334415599533; PMid:26319113 PMCid:PMC4882127
Zhao ZH, Huang YY, Qiao J, Huang WP, Redding SR, Wang R, Ouyang YQ. (2023, Jun). Co-Parenting Impact on Breastfeeding: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Breastfeed Med. 18(6): 431-448. Epub 2023 Jun 6. https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2022.0237; PMid:37285199
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Modern pediatrics. Ukraine
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The policy of the Journal “MODERN PEDIATRICS. UKRAINE” is compatible with the vast majority of funders' of open access and self-archiving policies. The journal provides immediate open access route being convinced that everyone – not only scientists - can benefit from research results, and publishes articles exclusively under open access distribution, with a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 international license (СС BY-NC).
Authors transfer the copyright to the Journal “MODERN PEDIATRICS. UKRAINE” when the manuscript is accepted for publication. Authors declare that this manuscript has not been published nor is under simultaneous consideration for publication elsewhere. After publication, the articles become freely available on-line to the public.
Readers have the right to use, distribute, and reproduce articles in any medium, provided the articles and the journal are properly cited.
The use of published materials for commercial purposes is strongly prohibited.