Peculiarities of complementary feeding among Ukrainian infants after 6 months of age
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15574/SP.2024.139.46Keywords:
babies, breastfeeding, supplementary food, Baby-Led WeaningAbstract
Introduction. Introduction period of complementary feeding is very important for the growth and development of the child. Today, alongside the traditional introduction of complementary foods, baby-led weaning (BLW) has become a real trend. This method assumes that the child joins the family table and independently decides what and how much to eat. The BLW method is actively discussed in the scientific literature due to a number of advantages and disadvantages.
Aim - to investigate and characterize the peculiarities of the introduction of complementary foods among Ukrainian infants after 6 months of age.
Materials and methods. A questionnaire was developed, which contained 3 blocks of questions. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among 545 women who had children aged 6-7 months to 2-3 years.
The results of the study were assessed using the t-Student criterion, Pearson's chi-square test, or Fisher's exact test, conducted with the help of the "XLSTAT" computer program. Differences were considered significant at p<0.05.
Results. It was revealed that 40.6% of mothers used BLW complementary food, 22.3% mixed type of complementary food, and 37.0% of respondents used traditional spoon feeding. Children who received BLW were born full-term (95.9%) and to a greater extent through spontaneous delivery (70.9%). Among the groups with different methods of complementary feeding, no significant difference was observed due to manifestations of atopy. It was determined that the child's independent decision of how much to eat (64.7%) and what to eat (52.9%) was more common in the group of interviewed mothers who used the BLW method compared to the groups using mixed and traditional feeding. The consistency of food at the beginning of complementary feeding corresponded to the method of feeding. Among the adverse events in the BLW group, shortness of breath from food entering the respiratory tract (11.8%, p=0.043) and to a lesser extent vomiting (28.4%, p=0.012) were observed more often compared to children on traditional complementary foods.
Conclusions. The data we obtained indicate the growing popularity of BLW among Ukrainian mothers and good awareness of mothers in the correct use of this method, and negative phenomena were observed no more than in similar surveys described in the scientific literature.
The research was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent of the child and child's parents was obtained for the research.
No conflict of interests was declared by the authors.
References
Białek-Dratwa A, Kowalski O, Szczepańska E. (2022). Traditional complementary feeding or BLW (Baby Led Weaning) method? - A cross-sectional study of Polish infants during complementary feeding. Sec. Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition. 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.992244; PMid:36340726 PMCid:PMC9634407
Bocqueta A, Brancatoc S, Turckd D, Chalumeaue M, Darmaung D, De Lucah A et al. (2022). 'Baby-led weaning' - progress in infant feeding or risky trend? Archives de Pédiatrie. 7(29): 516-525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcped.2022.08.012; PMid:36109286
Brown A. (2016). Differences in eating behaviour, well-being and personality between mothers following baby-led vs. traditional weaning styles. Matern Child Nutr. 12: 826-837. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12172; PMid:25623385 PMCid:PMC6860066
Brown A. (2018). No difference in self-reported frequency of choking between infants introduced to solid foods using a baby-led weaning or traditional spoon-feeding approach. J Hum Nutr Diet. 31(4): 496-504. https://doi.org/10.1111/jhn.12528; PMid:29205569
Brown A, Lee MD. (2015). Early influences on child satiety-responsiveness: the role of weaning style. Pediatr Obes. 10(1): 57-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2047-6310.2013.00207.x; PMid:24347496
Cameron SL, Heath A-LM, Taylor RW. (2012). How feasible is baby-led weaning as an approach to infant feeding? a review of the evidence. Nutrients. 4(11): 1575-1609. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu4111575; PMid:23201835 PMCid:PMC3509508
Cameron SL, Taylor RW, Heath ALM. (2015). Development and pilot testing of Baby-Led Introduction to SolidS - a version of Baby-Led Weaning modified to address concerns about iron deficiency, growth faltering and choking. BMC Pediatr. 15(1): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-015-0422-8; PMid:26306667 PMCid:PMC4549838
Daelmans B, Martins J, Saaderh R. (2003). Conclusions of the global consultation on complementary feeding. Food and Nutrition Bulletin. 24: 126-129. https://doi.org/10.1177/156482650302400107; PMid:12664530
D'Andrea E, Jenkins K, Mathews M, Roebothan B. (2016, Jun). Baby-led Weaning: A Preliminary Investigation Can J Diet Pract Res. 77(2): 72-77. https://doi.org/10.3148/cjdpr-2015-045; PMid:26771760
Fangupo LJ, Heath AM, Williams SM et al. (2016). A Baby-Led Approach to Eating Solids and Risk of Choking. Pediatrics. 138(4). https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-0772; PMid:27647715
Fewtrell M, Bronsky J, Campoy C. Domellöf M, Embleton N, Fidler Mis N et al. (2017). Complementary feeding: a position paper by the European society for paediatric gastroenterology, hepatology, and nutrition (ESPGHAN) committee on nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 64: 119-132. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000001454; PMid:28027215
Gardner GH, Dowd MD, Baum C, Durbin D. (2010). Policy Statement-Prevention of Choking Among Children Рediatrics. 125(3): 601-607. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-2862; PMid:20176668
Gomez MS, Toneto Novaes AP, Paulino da Silva J, Guerra LM, Rosana de Fátima Possobon. (2020). Baby-led weaning, an overview of the new approach to food introduction: integrative literature review. Rev Paul Pediatr. 13: 38:e2018084. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-0462/2020/38/2018084; PMid:31939505 PMCid:PMC6958549
Kramer MS, Kakuma R. (2004). The optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding: a systematic review Adv Exp Med Biol. 554: 63-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4242-8_7; PMid:15384567
Mclean E, Cogswell M, Egli I, Wojdyla D, de Benoist B. (2008). Worldwide prevalence of anaemia, WHO Vitamin and Mineral Nutrition Information System. Public Health Nutr. 12(4): 444-454. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980008002401; PMid:18498676
Rapley G. (2015). Baby-led weaning: The theory and evidence behind the approach. J Health Visit. 3(3): 144-151. https://doi.org/10.12968/johv.2015.3.3.144
Rowan H, Harris C. (2012). Baby-led weaning and the family diet. A pilot study. Appetite. 58(3): 1046-1049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2012.01.033; PMid:22406580
Szajewska H, Socha P, Horvath A. (2021). Zasady żywienia zdrowych niemowląt. Stanowisko Polskiego Towarzystwa Gastroenterologii, Hepatologii i Żywienia Dzieci. Standardy Medyczne. 18: 805-822. doi: 10.17444/SMP2021.18.02.
Townsend E, Pitchford NJ. (2012). Baby knows best? The impact of weaning style on food preferences and body mass index in early childhood in a case-controlled sample. BMJ. 2(1): e000298. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000298; PMid:22315302 PMCid:PMC4400680
World Health Organization. (2003). Global strategy for infant and young child feeding. World Health Organization: UNICEF. URL: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9241562218.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Modern pediatrics. Ukraine
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The policy of the Journal “MODERN PEDIATRICS. UKRAINE” is compatible with the vast majority of funders' of open access and self-archiving policies. The journal provides immediate open access route being convinced that everyone – not only scientists - can benefit from research results, and publishes articles exclusively under open access distribution, with a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 international license (СС BY-NC).
Authors transfer the copyright to the Journal “MODERN PEDIATRICS. UKRAINE” when the manuscript is accepted for publication. Authors declare that this manuscript has not been published nor is under simultaneous consideration for publication elsewhere. After publication, the articles become freely available on-line to the public.
Readers have the right to use, distribute, and reproduce articles in any medium, provided the articles and the journal are properly cited.
The use of published materials for commercial purposes is strongly prohibited.