Peculiarities of complementary feeding among Ukrainian infants after 6 months of age

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15574/SP.2024.139.46

Keywords:

babies, breastfeeding, supplementary food, Baby-Led Weaning

Abstract

Introduction. Introduction period of complementary feeding is very important for the growth and development of the child. Today, alongside the traditional introduction of complementary foods, baby-led weaning (BLW) has become a real trend. This method assumes that the child joins the family table and independently decides what and how much to eat. The BLW method is actively discussed in the scientific literature due to a number of advantages and disadvantages.

Aim - to investigate and characterize the peculiarities of the introduction of complementary foods among Ukrainian infants after 6 months of age.

Materials and methods. A questionnaire was developed, which contained 3 blocks of questions. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among 545 women who had children aged 6-7 months to 2-3 years.

The results of the study were assessed using the t-Student criterion, Pearson's chi-square test, or Fisher's exact test, conducted with the help of the "XLSTAT" computer program. Differences were considered significant at p<0.05.

Results. It was revealed that 40.6% of mothers used BLW complementary food, 22.3% mixed type of complementary food, and 37.0% of respondents used traditional spoon feeding. Children who received BLW were born full-term (95.9%) and to a greater extent through spontaneous delivery (70.9%). Among the groups with different methods of complementary feeding, no significant difference was observed due to manifestations of atopy. It was determined that the child's independent decision of how much to eat (64.7%) and what to eat (52.9%) was more common in the group of interviewed mothers who used the BLW method compared to the groups using mixed and traditional feeding. The consistency of food at the beginning of complementary feeding corresponded to the method of feeding. Among the adverse events in the BLW group, shortness of breath from food entering the respiratory tract (11.8%, p=0.043) and to a lesser extent vomiting (28.4%, p=0.012) were observed more often compared to children on traditional complementary foods.

Conclusions. The data we obtained indicate the growing popularity of BLW among Ukrainian mothers and good awareness of mothers in the correct use of this method, and negative phenomena were observed no more than in similar surveys described in the scientific literature.

The research was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent of the child and child's parents was obtained for the research.

No conflict of interests was declared by the authors.

References

Białek-Dratwa A, Kowalski O, Szczepańska E. (2022). Traditional complementary feeding or BLW (Baby Led Weaning) method? - A cross-sectional study of Polish infants during complementary feeding. Sec. Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition. 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.992244; PMid:36340726 PMCid:PMC9634407

Bocqueta A, Brancatoc S, Turckd D, Chalumeaue M, Darmaung D, De Lucah A et al. (2022). 'Baby-led weaning' - progress in infant feeding or risky trend? Archives de Pédiatrie. 7(29): 516-525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcped.2022.08.012; PMid:36109286

Brown A. (2016). Differences in eating behaviour, well-being and personality between mothers following baby-led vs. traditional weaning styles. Matern Child Nutr. 12: 826-837. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12172; PMid:25623385 PMCid:PMC6860066

Brown A. (2018). No difference in self-reported frequency of choking between infants introduced to solid foods using a baby-led weaning or traditional spoon-feeding approach. J Hum Nutr Diet. 31(4): 496-504. https://doi.org/10.1111/jhn.12528; PMid:29205569

Brown A, Lee MD. (2015). Early influences on child satiety-responsiveness: the role of weaning style. Pediatr Obes. 10(1): 57-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2047-6310.2013.00207.x; PMid:24347496

Cameron SL, Heath A-LM, Taylor RW. (2012). How feasible is baby-led weaning as an approach to infant feeding? a review of the evidence. Nutrients. 4(11): 1575-1609. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu4111575; PMid:23201835 PMCid:PMC3509508

Cameron SL, Taylor RW, Heath ALM. (2015). Development and pilot testing of Baby-Led Introduction to SolidS - a version of Baby-Led Weaning modified to address concerns about iron deficiency, growth faltering and choking. BMC Pediatr. 15(1): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-015-0422-8; PMid:26306667 PMCid:PMC4549838

Daelmans B, Martins J, Saaderh R. (2003). Conclusions of the global consultation on complementary feeding. Food and Nutrition Bulletin. 24: 126-129. https://doi.org/10.1177/156482650302400107; PMid:12664530

D'Andrea E, Jenkins K, Mathews M, Roebothan B. (2016, Jun). Baby-led Weaning: A Preliminary Investigation Can J Diet Pract Res. 77(2): 72-77. https://doi.org/10.3148/cjdpr-2015-045; PMid:26771760

Fangupo LJ, Heath AM, Williams SM et al. (2016). A Baby-Led Approach to Eating Solids and Risk of Choking. Pediatrics. 138(4). https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-0772; PMid:27647715

Fewtrell M, Bronsky J, Campoy C. Domellöf M, Embleton N, Fidler Mis N et al. (2017). Complementary feeding: a position paper by the European society for paediatric gastroenterology, hepatology, and nutrition (ESPGHAN) committee on nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 64: 119-132. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000001454; PMid:28027215

Gardner GH, Dowd MD, Baum C, Durbin D. (2010). Policy Statement-Prevention of Choking Among Children Рediatrics. 125(3): 601-607. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-2862; PMid:20176668

Gomez MS, Toneto Novaes AP, Paulino da Silva J, Guerra LM, Rosana de Fátima Possobon. (2020). Baby-led weaning, an overview of the new approach to food introduction: integrative literature review. Rev Paul Pediatr. 13: 38:e2018084. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-0462/2020/38/2018084; PMid:31939505 PMCid:PMC6958549

Kramer MS, Kakuma R. (2004). The optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding: a systematic review Adv Exp Med Biol. 554: 63-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4242-8_7; PMid:15384567

Mclean E, Cogswell M, Egli I, Wojdyla D, de Benoist B. (2008). Worldwide prevalence of anaemia, WHO Vitamin and Mineral Nutrition Information System. Public Health Nutr. 12(4): 444-454. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980008002401; PMid:18498676

Rapley G. (2015). Baby-led weaning: The theory and evidence behind the approach. J Health Visit. 3(3): 144-151. https://doi.org/10.12968/johv.2015.3.3.144

Rowan H, Harris C. (2012). Baby-led weaning and the family diet. A pilot study. Appetite. 58(3): 1046-1049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2012.01.033; PMid:22406580

Szajewska H, Socha P, Horvath A. (2021). Zasady żywienia zdrowych niemowląt. Stanowisko Polskiego Towarzystwa Gastroenterologii, Hepatologii i Żywienia Dzieci. Standardy Medyczne. 18: 805-822. doi: 10.17444/SMP2021.18.02.

Townsend E, Pitchford NJ. (2012). Baby knows best? The impact of weaning style on food preferences and body mass index in early childhood in a case-controlled sample. BMJ. 2(1): e000298. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000298; PMid:22315302 PMCid:PMC4400680

World Health Organization. (2003). Global strategy for infant and young child feeding. World Health Organization: UNICEF. URL: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9241562218.

Published

2024-04-28

Issue

Section

Original articles