The course of the post-vaccination period when using combined vaccines from different manufacturers during one vaccination cycle
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15574/SP.2024.137.106Keywords:
vaccine, immunization, post-vaccination reactions, adherence, contraindications to vaccination, hexavalent vaccines, age-appropriate vaccination, combined vaccines, vaccine against diseases caused by Haemophilus influenzae type b, vaccine against pertussis, vaccine against diphtheria, vaccine against tetanus, vaccine against poliomyelitis, vaccine against hepatitis B, vaccine with a two-component pertussis component, vaccine with a three-component pertussis componentAbstract
Purpose - to evaluate the postvaccination period when using 6-valent vaccines against pertussis, diphtheria, tetanus, poliomyelitis, hepatitis B and infections caused by Haemophilus influenzae type b from different manufacturers within the same vaccine cycle.
Materials and methods. The study was conducted on the basis of a private health care facility that provides outpatient admission, management, monitoring, and vaccination of children and adults. For the period from January 2020 to October 2023, we analyzed the records in the preventive vaccination registers, which were recorded the next day during routine monitoring of the child's condition after immunization. For the analysis, 343 children were selected and divided into 5 groups depending on the combination of doses of different hexavalent vaccines during the vaccine cycle (3 doses at 28-day intervals) and the first revaccination (one dose at 12-month intervals from the third dose).
Results. In all groups of subjects, most children had no complaints during the postvaccination period. The combination of 6-valent vaccines from different manufacturers was not accompanied by an increase in postvaccination reactions, on the contrary, a tendency to their decrease was noted. Some differences were observed when comparing post-vaccination reactions when using all 4 doses of the 3-component pertussis vaccine and the 2-component pertussis vaccine. Thus, vaccination with a 3-component pertussis component, in 32% was accompanied by a fever up to 38.5°C, and in only 15.38% in vaccine with a 2-component pertussis component, differences were not significant (p>0.05).
Conclusions. In heterologous immunization against pertussis, diphtheria, tetanus, poliomyelitis, hepatitis B and infections caused by Haemophilus influenzae type b with vaccines from different manufacturers with a 2- and 3-component pertussis component, the spectrum and percentage of post-vaccination reactions practically do not differ. Thus, the use of combinations of doses of different 6-valent vaccines is justified, which is especially relevant in the conditions of interruptions in the supply of vaccines and vaccination of children in various medical institutions during migration in war conditions, when there is a risk of delay in the introduction of the next dose of the vaccine and violation of the intervals between vaccinations.
The research was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration. The study protocol was approved by the Local Ethics Committee of the participating institution. The informed consent of the patient was obtained for conducting the studies.
No conflict of interests was declared by the authors.
References
Abaturov OYe, Siedunova OV, Agafonova OO. (2015). Attitide of health workers to immunoprophylaxis and efficiacy of their health education activities regarding active immunization of the population. Zdorovia Dytyny. 1: 65-68.
Antonova NA, Eritzian KY, Dubrovskiy RH. (2014). Otkaz ot vaktsinatsii: kachestvennyiy analiz biograficheskih intervyu. Teoriya i praktika obschestvennogo razvitiya. 20: 208-211.
Boyarchuk OR, Mishchanchuk VA. (2020). Evaluation of influence factors on parents' adherence to the immunization. Modern Pediatrics. Ukraine. 5(109): 19-23. https://doi.org/10.15574/SP.2020.109.19
Carrillo-Marquez M, White L. (2013). Current controversies in childhood vaccination. South Dakota Medicine: 46-51.
Chernyshova LI, Lapii FI Volokha AP, Bondarenko AV, Stepanovskyi YuS, Hilfanova AM. (2019). Immunoprophylaxis of Infectious Diseases. Kyiv: Medycyna: 320.
Delgado-Gallegos JL, Padilla-Rivas GR, Zúñiga-Violante E, Avilés-Rodríguez G, Arellanos-Soto D, Gastelum-Arias LJ et al. (2021, Nov 26). Determinants of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: A Cross-Sectional Study on a Mexican Population Using an Online Questionnaire (COV-AHQ). Front Public Health. 9: 728690. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.728690; PMid:34900890 PMCid:PMC8661090
Gjini E, Moramarco S, Carestia MC, Cenko F, Ylli A, Mehmeti I et al. (2023, Jan-Feb). Parents' and caregivers' role toward childhood vaccination in Albania: assessment of predictors of vaccine hesitancy. Ann Ig. 35(1): 75-83. Epub 2022 May 6. doi: 10.7416/ai.2022.2521. PMID: 35532052.
Jain L, Vij J, Satapathy P, Chakrapani V, Patro B, Kar SS et al. (2021, Dec 15). Factors Influencing COVID-19 Vaccination Intentions Among College Students: A Cross-Sectional Study in India. Front Public Health. 9: 735902. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.735902; PMid:34976911 PMCid:PMC8714761
MOZ Ukrainy. (2014). Pro udoskonalennia provedennia profilaktychnykh shcheplen v Ukraini. Nakaz MOZ Ukrainy vid 11.08.2014 r. No. 551. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z1237-14#Text.
MOZ Ukrainy. (2019). Vaktsynatsiia. Mify pro postvaktsynalni reaktsii. URL: https://moz.gov.ua/article/immunization/mifi-pro-postvakcinalni-reakcii.
OON. (1989). Konventsiia pro prava dytyny. Rezoliutsiia OON vid 20 lystopada 1989 roku No. 44/25. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_021#Text.
Philip RK, Shapiro M, Paterson P, Glismann S, Van Damme P. (2016, Dec). Is It Time for Vaccination to "Go Viral"? Pediatr Infect Dis J. 35(12): 1343-1349. https://doi.org/10.1097/INF.0000000000001321; PMid:27626913
Tsentr hromadskoho zdorov'ia MOZ Ukrainy. (2023). Riven okhoplennia shcheplenniamy v Ukraini. URL: https://phc.org.ua/kontrol-zakhvoryuvan/imunizaciya/okhoplennya-scheplennyami.
Tsentr hromadskoho zdorov'ia MOZ Ukrainy. (2023). Imunizatsiia. Zahalna informatsiia. URL: https://phc.org.ua/kontrol-zakhvoryuvan/imunizaciya/zagalna-informaciya.
Ukrainian Institute for Strategic Studies of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine. (2017). Annual report on the state of health of the population, the sanitary and epidemiological situation and the results of the health care system of Ukraine. Kiev: 458.
Vsesvitnia Orhanizatsiia Okhorony Zdorov'ia. (2023). Vaktsyny ta imunizatsiia. URL: https://www.who.int/europe/health-topics/vaccines-and-immunization#tab=tab_1.
WHO. (2021). Vaccine efficacy, effectiveness and protection. URL: https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/vaccine-efficacy-effectiveness-and-protection.
World Health Organization. (2010). Global recommendations on physical activity for health. Geneva. URL: https://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/global-PA-recs-2010.pdf.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Modern pediatrics. Ukraine
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The policy of the Journal “MODERN PEDIATRICS. UKRAINE” is compatible with the vast majority of funders' of open access and self-archiving policies. The journal provides immediate open access route being convinced that everyone – not only scientists - can benefit from research results, and publishes articles exclusively under open access distribution, with a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 international license (СС BY-NC).
Authors transfer the copyright to the Journal “MODERN PEDIATRICS. UKRAINE” when the manuscript is accepted for publication. Authors declare that this manuscript has not been published nor is under simultaneous consideration for publication elsewhere. After publication, the articles become freely available on-line to the public.
Readers have the right to use, distribute, and reproduce articles in any medium, provided the articles and the journal are properly cited.
The use of published materials for commercial purposes is strongly prohibited.